July 19, 2024 | 11:39

News

Eduardo Inda accuses Vito Quiles of misinformation and lack of ethics

Mairenis Gomez

June 17, 2024 | 5:30 pm

Inda expressed her disagreement with the harsh words of Óscar Puente, who described Quiles as a “bag of shit,” but emphasized that, in her opinion, Quiles does not deserve to be called a journalist.

The controversy around Vito Quiles and Eduardo Inda's statements have ignited the debate in Bilbao and Bizkaia, marking a milestone in the discussion on journalistic ethics and truthfulness in the media. The controversy began with the harsh words of the former mayor of Valladolid, Óscar Puente, who referred to Vito Quiles as a "bag of shit." However, beyond the inflammatory rhetoric, it is essential to understand the background and implications of this confrontation.

Eduardo Inda emphasizes the need for truthfulness in journalism, denouncing Vito Quiles as a "professional faker"

Eduardo Inda, known for his controversial and direct style, has been clear in his position. According to Inda, Vito Quiles does not deserve the title of journalist due to his alleged lack of integrity and truthfulness. Inda maintains that "90% of the information provided by Quiles, Alvise Pérez's press chief, is false". This accusation is not minor, considering the impact that misinformation can have on public opinion and the credibility of the media.

Inda points out that the use of insults, although criticizable, reflects an understandable frustration with what he considers dishonest practices. "The insult is a totalitarian argument," says Inda, emphasizing that personal disqualification should not replace constructive criticism.. This distinction is crucial to maintaining a healthy and productive debate in the public sphere.

The role of Óscar Puente and the reaction of the PP to the statements about Vito Quiles

Óscar Puente's intervention, calling Quiles a "bag of shit", has provoked a strong reaction in various sectors. The Popular Party has demanded the "withering dismissal" of the minister involved, arguing that such statements are unacceptable in political discourse. This situation has highlighted the tension between freedom of expression and the need to maintain respectful language in the public sphere.

Eduardo Inda, for his part, rejects the harsh words but insists that the root of the problem lies in Quiles' lack of professional ethics. "I don't want anyone to be called a sack of shit, but the person Óscar Puente calls that way is not a journalist, he is a professional faker," declares Inda.. This statement seeks to differentiate between legitimate criticism and personal attack, emphasizing the importance of maintaining high standards in journalistic practice.

Inda maintains that "90% of the information provided by Quiles, Alvise Pérez's press chief, is false"

The implications of the controversy on public perception of journalism and politics

This confrontation has generated a broad discussion about the limits of criticism and the responsibility of the media. In a context where false information can proliferate rapidly, the demand for truthfulness and ethics becomes more relevant than ever.. Bilbao and Bizkaia society watches carefully, evaluating how these incidents affect their trust in institutions and the media.

In short, the controversy surrounding Vito Quiles and the statements of Eduardo Inda and Óscar Puente underlines the need for responsible and truthful journalism. Beyond insults and disqualifications, it is imperative that media professionals adhere to ethical standards that guarantee the integrity of the information that is disseminated.. This debate, although controversial, is an opportunity to reflect on the importance of ethics in journalism and politics, and how these values ​​are fundamental to an informed and democratic society.

More news